Archive for September, 2006

In Defense of Globalization book review

September 18th, 2006

In Defense of Globalization

by Jagdish Bhagwati

Jagdish Bhagwati, an economist specializing in international trade and a professor at Columbia University, has written a very indepth book arguing that economic globalization overall has (and is having) a tremendous positive impact on the poor. He looks closely at the many critiques and perceptions of globalization and provides responses to many of them.

He notes the ironic fact that “anti-globalization sentiments are more prevalent in the rich countries of the North, while pluralities of policy makers and the public in the poor countries of the South see globalization instead as a positive force.” (p.8)

In commenting on anti-capital sentiments he notes, “I often wonder … how many of the young skeptics of capitalism are aware that socialist planning in countries such as India, by replacing markets systemwide with bureaucratically determined rations of goods and services, worsened rather than improved unequal access because socialism meant queues that the well-connected and the well-endowed could jump, whereas markets allowed a larger number to make it to the check-out counter.” (p.15) He notes that anti-capitalism, anti-corporation and anti-Americanism attitudes (for various different reasons) have have unfortunately turned into anti-globalization rhetoric.

Some people argue that Bhagwati is a free-market-with-no-limits zealot. I found Bhagwati to be very balanced in this book. He owns his own bias to taking a macroeconomic viewpoint while showing sensibilities for how there are impacts on a microeconomic level. He critiques the ultra-liberal and ultra-isolationist international trade viewpoints. He also provides many critiques of globalization practices and provides suggestions about how to reduce ill-effects, abuses and impact on the displaced. For instance, he argues for gradualism in changing short-term capital restrictions in order for the developing nations’ financial institutions to mature and prevent another Asian-type financial crisis.

Topics he tackles include:

  • Poverty: Enhanced or Diminished?
  • Child Labor: Increased or Reduced?
  • Women: Harmed of Helped?
  • Democracy at Bay?
  • Culture Imperiled or Enriched?
  • Wages and Labor Standards at Stake?
  • Environment in Peril?
  • Corporations: Predatory or Beneficial?

I found the last section of the book on how to improve governance to make globalization work better a bit dry and lacking in pragmatism … but this is a hard topic with much political complexity.

So, overall, I highly recommend this book for anyone who wants to get smarter about globalization benefits, problems and how to drive the benefits of globalization to more equal distribution.

Climate change … seeking the whole story

September 17th, 2006

If climate change is happening and if these changes result in impact on humans, then most people agree that the poor will be inproportionately burdened with the negative impact of climate change. So, this is my interest in this blog.

I say “if” because there is disagreement on climate change … particularly on how much of it is caused by humans and how to predict both future changes and their consequences. Al Gore is clearly angling for people’s fears with his An Inconvenient Truth movie. Others are “fighting back” with other facts (conveniently left out?) like this article published in Car & Driver magazine (conflict of interest?). Climatologist, Richard Lindzen argues in his testimony to congress that there are some agreements on a few facts, but there are huge differences in the interpretations of those facts.

Why is it that people are so eager to share selected facts, but not those which are in contradiction to their conclusions (and interests)?

Last week’s issue of The Economist published a pretty indepth survey on the topic of climate change. Their conclusion is that there are enough indicators that climate change might be happening and that it is worth some investment as “insurance” against the possible implications. But they are clear to say that in reality very little is known about climate change and talking in terms of certainty of where things are going and what the results are is intellectually dishonest.

What frustrates me the most is that there appear to be very few people who are willing to tell you the “whole story” about what is known about climate change and to OWN their own biases (which everyone has). So, I encourage you to get smarter about this topic by reading the range of opinions … not just the ones that you’re inclined towards.

If you are going to refer to other links in comments, PLEASE don’t refer to one-sided, simplistic, I-know-everything-and-here’s-what-you-do arguments on this very complex, nuanced and potentially very important topic.

Land titles necessary, but insufficient

September 11th, 2006

I wrote previously about an insightful book by Hernando de Soto called The Mystery of Capital which argues for the importance of legitimizing land rights for the poor as a key in breaking poverty. By not having legal right to property, the poor people’s property is effect “dead capital” as it cannot be used as collateral, sold or inherited.

The Economist recently published an article called The mystery of capital deepens which follows the progress of an interesting land rights situation in Argentina. On the outskirts of Buenos Aires, a number of squatters outlasted various governments until a new government expropriated the land and gave it to the squatters. But some of the squatters didn’t like the terms, so there are now two groups side-by-side — land owners and squatters.

Summary of results: [Here is a more in-depth study.]

  • secure land rights encourage the poor to improve their residences/living conditions
  • [poor] titled landowners have no better access to financial services

This demonstrates the continued need for alternative financial services for the poor — e.g. microfinance. The large, traditional bank sector continues to have little appetite for serving the poor.

Wiring Rwanda

September 11th, 2006

Greg Wyler, an American tech entrepreneur, is investing his own money in bringing Internet services as a business to Rwanda. His company, Terracom Communications is for the first time offering cellphone coverage, Internet access and television to unserved parts of the country. Terracom is hooking up schools to the Internet and opening Internet cafes throughout the country. They are even starting to offer high-speed laptop mobile network services like Verizon/Sprint EVDO service!

There are lots of questions about whether this business will ultimately succeed, but at least he is trying!

Read the WSJ story

Related Posts with Thumbnails