<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Implications of For-Profit Microfinance</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.defeatpoverty.com/2006/06/implications-of-for-profit-microfinance.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.defeatpoverty.com/2006/06/implications-of-for-profit-microfinance.html</link>
	<description>A conversation on global economic issues, ideas &#38; data to help us all become better contributors to defeating the scourge of extreme global poverty</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 03:26:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Valerie Rozycki</title>
		<link>http://www.defeatpoverty.com/2006/06/implications-of-for-profit-microfinance.html/comment-page-1#comment-40</link>
		<dc:creator>Valerie Rozycki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jun 2006 09:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.defeatpoverty.com/2006/06/implications-of-for-profit-microfinance.html#comment-40</guid>
		<description>I completely agree with the benefits of for-profit or commercialized microfinance.  As long as the leadership maintains a focus on the poorest sectors, this is the key to sustainability, expansion, and involvement of private institutional investors and other players who can help expand the sector.  This is a very thorough post, thanks!&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Another benefit to a movement towards for-profit models is that it creates opportunities for the involvement of the general public.  For example, Kiva.org is a peer-to-peer lending web platform that allows individuals to make loans directly to micro-entrepreneurs overseas.  The more efficient the MFI, the more possible it is to make a &quot;loan&quot; (even if it is 0% interest) to a micro-entrepreneur rather than the traditional model of a philanthropic &quot;hand-out&quot;.  There is still room for pure philanthropy, but a model like Kiva.org makes participation in social efforts like microfinance much more accessible!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I completely agree with the benefits of for-profit or commercialized microfinance.  As long as the leadership maintains a focus on the poorest sectors, this is the key to sustainability, expansion, and involvement of private institutional investors and other players who can help expand the sector.  This is a very thorough post, thanks!</p>
<p>Another benefit to a movement towards for-profit models is that it creates opportunities for the involvement of the general public.  For example, Kiva.org is a peer-to-peer lending web platform that allows individuals to make loans directly to micro-entrepreneurs overseas.  The more efficient the MFI, the more possible it is to make a &#8220;loan&#8221; (even if it is 0% interest) to a micro-entrepreneur rather than the traditional model of a philanthropic &#8220;hand-out&#8221;.  There is still room for pure philanthropy, but a model like Kiva.org makes participation in social efforts like microfinance much more accessible!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

