Archive for September, 2005

Laptops for the poor

September 29th, 2005

Very interesting idea for a $100 laptop which could be distributed widely to school children in developing countries is being championed by MIT Media Lab’s Nicholas Negroponte.

“Power for the new systems will be provided through either conventional electric current, batteries or by a windup crank attached to the side of the notebooks, since many countries targeted by the plan do not have power in remote areas” said Negroponte.

There is also the possibility of selling to consumers at say $200 of which $30 would be contributed towards distributing more the $100 laptops to poor school children.

Very interesting initiative which could help accelerate education.

Update: New non-profit organization setup to carry forward this mission.

Debt forgiveness grand experiment

September 25th, 2005

The New York Times reported today that the G8 finance ministers have come to an implementation agreement on eliminating up to $55B in multi-lateral debt owed by 18 poor countries. Essentially the G8 have contractually committed to cover the World Bank’s dollar-for-dollar cost of this in ADDITION to their regular contributions. In reality this is worth closer to $18B in near-term dollars … significant nonetheless. This also sets a model where additional countries (up to 35 in total) can qualify to participate for even more debt cancellation.

This debt cancellation has been connected with requirements that “sound” economic policies and meet reasonable standards for good governance [details still tbd.] This is the [amazingly relatively new] concept that aid [in this case, debt cancellation] is contingent upon governments investing funds in ways that help alleviate poverty. Obviously, the devil is in the details on whether these requirements are “reasonable” [historically, some requirements have not been] and, more importantly, helpful in ensuring accountability for spending.

This is an amazing breakthrough and, frankly, a grand experiment in a new approach to aid proposed by a number of economists and anti-poverty activists including Jeffrey Sachs. Why a grand experiment? Because it hasn’t been proven that these kind of monies will be directed to help the poor. There is so much pressure (and historical precedent) for poor incumbent governments to take windfall monies and invest them ineffectively. It is understandable (although not excusable) that governments are tempted to spend money on short-term, non-sustainable activities (e.g. welfare, high-profile pet projects) which are politically popular but which are not building up the long-term infrastructure (human and physical.) And then there’s the unfortunately not-too-uncommon cronyism which favors the wealthy over long-term public interest.

In the spirit of Bono, though, I won’t succumb to being a skeptic. This is a needed experiment which we should all watch closely to ensure it is successful.

Wolf #2 has a new war

September 25th, 2005

It is interesting how many anti-poverty supporters were against Wolfowitz (former US deputy secretary of defense) being placed as president of the World Bank. The New York Times reported that Wolfowitz is already pressing the US publicly to step up and commit more specific budget $ long-term to anti-poverty goals including the Millenium Development Goals. He is also promoting an approach to modernizing agricultural practices in Africa (to benefit from the rest of the world’s so-called “green revolution” — basically using better seeds and modern ag techniques.) He is also advocating for infrastructure projects like Jeff Sachs recommended in The End of Poverty.

Frankly, I think having someone who has the tenaciousness to run a military war may have what it takes to drive a war on poverty. The jury is still out on Wolf #2, but there’s some interesting early promise in his priorities.

Yunus: statesman for the poor

September 21st, 2005

I had the opportunity to hear Muhammad Yunus, founder and director of The Grameen Bank, earlier this week speaking at an event in Seattle.

Yunus is very much an activist for practical solutions to defeating poverty. He recounted his story of starting The Grameen Bank, now one of the largest banks in Bangladesh with now over 5M micro-credit borrowers. They also launched a mobile phone company in Bangladesh called Grameen Phone targeting the rural poor which has now become not only the largest phone company in the country, but also the largest company and tax payer! More than 200,000 micro-entrepreneur “phone ladies” are now operating in villages all over Bangladesh renting out phone minutes to fellow villagers. This is a significant service to the rural communities, a profitable business for the phone ladies and a profitable business for the phone company — a triple win.

The Bonsai People

Yunus is very much an advocate for the potential of the human spirit in every person. He believes that people are poor not because of their own actions but because of the systems that have denied them the ability to reach their potential. Yunus provided the analogy of the bonsai tree. He said that you can take a seed from the largest tree in the forest and put it in a small pot, limit its water and it will grow up as a dwarf tree. Yunus said that this is a good analogy for how potential is not realized by poor people.

Dream Your World

Yunus was asked about how he would talk with well-off children about poverty. He said that we should encourage our children to dream about the world they want. Then we should encourage our children to pursue making that world. Wow!

Social Entrepreneurs

Yunus was asked about what he saw as the next major movement. He talked about a new kind of business person who was building a business to make a profit (for no business will survive without profit) but also to equally value providing a social return. This contrasts with the Wall Street approach of focusing exclusively on maximizing profitability. He envisions an industry developing around social capitalism to run alongside the traditional profit-only focused industry.

Previous post on Grameen and beggars

Bono is not a skeptic

September 20th, 2005

This past Sunday, James Traub did an impressively insightful cover story on Bono: The Statesman in New York Times Magazine about Bono’s journey along the path of advocating for the poor.

Here are some of the highlights I liked in the story:

  • Bono knows how to “ask big” and celebrate partial progress. Bono praised Chirac at a U2 Paris conference in spite of Chirac’s incomplete support. Guess who called him later and asked to work more closely with him?
  • Bono knows how to align himself with both the left and the right. He appeals to different people in different ways for the sake of the “emergency” of poverty.
  • Bono thanks people – big and small. He signs every item fans extend to him to sign. He thanks major leaders for their actions and the impact that they will have. Bono praised the Bush administration for the commitment to the Millennium Challenge Account (for funding AID relief in Africa) even though it had conditions attached to it that he didn’t approve of. Notice, he thanked people, not the program.
  • Bono trusts people taking them at their word. When Condoleeza Rice privately made a verbal committed that the Bush administration would later make a historic commitment to fight AIDS, Bono trusted her and gave them his support even though that promise was not made public. Rice delivered.
  • Bono likes to sing his messages. When asked why he preferred a goal of canceling all of the debt in Africa instead of the, then current, 2/3’s cancellation, he said that you can’t sing about two-thirds of something. Instead, “it has to feel like history … incrementalism leaves the audience in a snooze.” Singing for Bono includes speeches and press conferences.
  • U2 has always stood for something positive. Rock for stopping bad things and Rock in favor of good things. Compare that with other rock bands.
  • Bono loves the world – he isn’t full of angst. This is so opposite to the angry words so many advocates have for others.
  • Bono likes to hear the whole story. After meeting with Jeffrey Sachs to hear his opinion, he asked Sachs to find him an academic who opposed his perspective.
  • Bono speaks unspoken dreams. “My generation wants to be the generation that ended extreme poverty.”
  • Bono say “yes and yes.” He calls for responsibility for the aid recipient as well as the aid donor.
  • Bono calls on everyone to be their best. Nothing less, nothing more.
  • Bono is in for the long haul. He decided to go low profile last week in New York for UN summit on Millennium Development Goals because of America’s focus on Katrina. Do you think that his quietness reflects any less passion for the MDGs?

Traub says that it isn’t Bono’s belief in the issue [of eliminating extreme poverty] that is so effective; it is his belief in others.”

And most importantly, Bono is not a skeptic. Yeah, I’m really tired of skeptics!

Oh yeah, and Bono like Brunello ;-)

UPDATE: Bono also answered questions in the New York Times. He’s asked about microcredit and talks about his meeting with Dr. Yunus. Bono offers this quote: “Give a man a fish, he’ll eat for a day. Give a woman microcredit, she, her husband, her children and her extended family will eat for a lifetime.”

The Fortune at the Bottom of the Pyramid book review

September 20th, 2005

fortuneThe Fortune At The Bottom of The Pyramid: Eradicating Poverty Through Profits

by C.K. Prahalad

Professor Prahalad, a respected business management consultant, shares results from in-depth case studies developed by his MBA students on how some multi-national organizations are targeting the world’s poor with specific products and services and the consequences. If you think globalization is all bad, this is a helpful and provocative read.

The World is Flat book review

September 16th, 2005

theworldisflatThe World is Flat: A Brief History of the Twenty-First Century

by Thomas Friedman

Friedman is the foreign affairs columnist for The New York Times. So, he gets to talk with lots of people around the world from the most senior government officials to academics to business leaders. His book The Lexus and the Olive Tree: Understanding Globalization (1999) is recognized as one of the definitive books in describing globalization and its effects and implications on various populations. Fortune magazine also just profiled Friedman in an article called Rockin’ in a Flat World.

In his latest book, Friedman argues that a number of changes have conspired in the late 1990’s to define start a new chapter in human history which opened at the dawn of the twenty-first century. He argues that 10 forces (from Berlin Wall coming down on 11/9/89 to the global Internet wiring to outsourcing/insourcing/offshoring to supply-chaining/workflow software to digital/mobile/personal/virtual revolutions) have created a new “flatter” world where it matters less where you live for your economic opportunities than any time in human history. In walks through how all of these changes have dramatic, change-the-rules implications about how we should think about the world.

He emphasizes how certain countries have benefited most from this flattening of the world – specifically India and China. He describes how countries like China have integrated themselves into the global supply chain and are continuing to advance up the value-added ladder from simple value-add to original design. He describes how India has (after opening its markets in the past 20 years) has unexpectedly become an IT development and services powerhouse.

“The World Bank reported that in 1990 there were roughly 375 million people in China living in extreme poverty, on less than $1 per day. By 2001, there were 212 million Chinese living in extreme poverty, and by 2015, if the trends hold, there will be only 16 million living on less than $1 a day. In South Asia – primarily India, Pakistan, and Bangladesh – the numbers go from 462 million in 1990 … down to 431 million by 2001 and down to 216 million is 2015. In sub-Saharan Africa, by contract, where globalization has been slow to take hold, there were 227 million … in 1990, 313 million in 2001 and an expected 340 million by 2015.” p. 315

Wow! What a contrast on the big picture impact of globalization.

Friedman also describes that forces which counteract this world “flattening” trend. There are still 3 billion people who are not connected to the new global economy. Africa is the single biggest block and much of Asia (including massive populations in India & China) and most of the Middle East are also “round” world economies. He suggests that 9/11 represents the opposite of 11/9 (the falling of the Berlin Wall). So, he describes a world where there are forces to flatten the world (globalization) which allow more people to join the world economy and move ahead economically. He then describes forces which are focused on “unflattening” the world. The unflattening forces fear the changes for various reasons but often because they are feeling left behind in the benefits of flattening.

One example he describes is the most recent national elections in India where the incumbent government was thrown out mainly by the rural vote. He interprets this vote not as an anti-globalization vote, but much more as a vote by the rural citizens that they too want to participate in the globalization benefits. The current Prime Minister of India is now implementing reforms intended to spread the wealth benefits of globalization more widely to the rural populations.

Friedman primarily focuses on the better off 3 billion people in the world and how the best educated and/or geographically privileged (e.g. those near ports where exports are booming) are now making gains that were once only possible if you lived in a developed country. So, poverty hawks may be frustrated by his lack of articulation of the deep challenges of those who are still born in the wrong “zip code” and don’t have access to infrastructure and education upon which they can have the opportunity to participate in the globalization wave. I think, though, that his observations about the positive aspects of globalization as an empowering and leveling opportunity for hundreds of millions (if not eventually billions) of the world’s poor are very helpful.

The Trouble with Islam Today book review

September 16th, 2005

troubleIslamThe Trouble with Islam Today: A Muslim’s Call for Reform in Her Faith

by Irshad Manji

This is one of the most different and interesting books I’ve read in a long time. Manji is a gay, practicing muslim who grew up in Vancouver, Canada (my home town) and now lives in Toronto, Canada. She is a journalist and now activist for reform in Islam. Manji describes herself as a muslim refusenik who is fed up with the stuck-in-the-6th-century, refusing to think mainstream muslim culture dominated by “desert Islam” religious despots. The anti-dote? Revive “ijtihad”, Islam’s lost tradition of independent thinking. She encourages both muslims and non-muslims to ask muslims hard questions about Islam rather than shrinking back [in silence] from fear of offending muslims or being culturally insensitive.

Regarding poverty, she calls out the decrease in per capita income in most of the middle east Arab countries including the ones that have oil. She describes the history of how the house of Saud (Saudi Arabia) cut a deal with the super-conservative Wahabi muslim sect which is still in place today creating a very oppressive culture. Many middle east citizens have university degrees (paid for by the government), but they have no jobs. Why? Because for one thing the content of their education is primarily religious around how to be a good muslim. Second, there has been no development of other non-oil industries to diversify the [very controlled] economy. So, Manji boldly calls for reform in Islam as one of the critical requirements for muslims to be true to the heart of the Koran and the historical spirit of freedom in Islam.

This book is a challenge to many of the politically incorrect questions we all need to ask ourselves about our own “fundamentalist” beliefs and tendencies.

Related Posts with Thumbnails